HIST 110: A History of the Western World 1

Christina Moss

Estimated study time: 32 minutes

Table of contents

Sources and References

These notes synthesize the narrative arc of a first-semester Western civilization survey running from the Bronze Age to the mid-seventeenth century. They draw principally on Judith Coffin and Robert Stacey, Western Civilizations: Their History and Their Culture, along with Jackson J. Spielvogel, Western Civilization: A History, and Merry Wiesner-Hanks, Clare Haru Crowston, Joe Perry, and John McKay, A History of Western Society, which was listed as optional reading. Further scholarship grounds the chapters: Peter Brown’s The World of Late Antiquity and The Rise of Western Christendom for the transition from Rome to the early medieval west; Norman F. Cantor’s The Civilization of the Middle Ages for the high medieval synthesis; Chris Wickham’s The Inheritance of Rome and Framing the Early Middle Ages for the post-Roman transformation; Peter Heather’s The Fall of the Roman Empire on Roman-barbarian interaction; Richard Fletcher’s The Barbarian Conversion; Diarmaid MacCulloch’s The Reformation: A History and Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years; Natalie Zemon Davis’s Trickster Travels: A Sixteenth-Century Muslim Between Worlds (which sits at the Mediterranean hinge of this course); Carlo Ginzburg’s The Cheese and the Worms; Marc Bloch’s Feudal Society; Robert Bartlett’s The Making of Europe, 950-1350; and Fernand Braudel’s The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Publicly available lecture notes from MIT OpenCourseWare courses on ancient and medieval history, Stanford’s History Corner materials on the Reformation, and Cambridge’s open lecture notes on late antiquity have been used to check chronology and framing. The textbook knowledge is paraphrased into original prose throughout.

Chapter 1: The Problem of “the West”

“The West” is not a thing one can point to. It is a story people tell about themselves, and different people have told it in startlingly different ways. Before entering the narrative of ancient Sumer or classical Athens, it helps to notice that every survey of Western civilization is also an argument about what should count and who belongs. The choice to begin in Mesopotamia, or Greece, or Jerusalem, or with the Neolithic Revolution, is already an interpretation. So is the decision to stop the first half of the course at 1650 or 1715, a date that pins western history to the rise of confessional states, European expansion, and the birth of a recognizably modern world system.

Periodization and the Shape of the Narrative

Historians divide the past into periods because undifferentiated time is impossible to think with. Yet those divisions—Antiquity, Middle Ages, Early Modern, Modern—are inventions of particular people at particular moments, usually Italian humanists and later European scholars who wished to mark their own era off from what came before. A period label tells you as much about the labeler as about the age being labeled. The so-called “Dark Ages” were dark mainly to fifteenth-century Florentines who wanted to shine by comparison. Recent scholarship, most influentially Peter Brown’s World of Late Antiquity and Chris Wickham’s Inheritance of Rome, has dissolved the old sharp break at 476 CE into a long, uneven transformation. Throughout this course, chronology and periodization will both be treated as working tools rather than facts of nature.

Civilization as a Contested Category

The very word civilization carries freight. It was coined in eighteenth-century France to describe a condition of refinement contrasted with barbarism, and it carried a built-in hierarchy from the start. Historians today are more cautious. James C. Scott’s work on early states, echoed in recent essays like David Graeber and David Wengrow’s The Dawn of Everything, argues that the shift from mobile foraging to settled agriculture was not a triumphant ascent but a messy, often coercive reorganization of human life. Urbanization brought writing, monumental art, and long-distance trade; it also brought disease, slavery, and the taxman. Keeping both sides of the ledger in view is essential to reading this period honestly.

Chapter 2: The Ancient Near East and Bronze Age Worlds

The oldest cities in the world rose on the alluvial plains between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in the fourth millennium BCE. Mesopotamia—the land between the rivers—gave the West its first experiments in literate urban life, and many of the institutions that would echo through later centuries were rehearsed here in clay.

Sumer, Akkad, and the First Cities

By roughly 3500 BCE, settlements like Uruk, Ur, and Lagash had grown into walled cities of tens of thousands of inhabitants, governed by a combination of priestly and royal authority centered on temple complexes called ziggurats. The Sumerians invented cuneiform, a wedge-shaped writing system pressed into clay tablets, initially for bookkeeping and tax records. Cuneiform became one of the most durable writing systems in history, used across multiple languages for three thousand years. Around 2350 BCE, Sargon of Akkad unified Sumer under the first large territorial empire in the historical record, a precedent every later Mesopotamian dynast would try to emulate.

Cuneiform: A system of writing developed in Mesopotamia around 3200 BCE in which a reed stylus was pressed into wet clay tablets to form wedge-shaped marks. It began as an accounting tool and evolved into a flexible script capable of recording laws, literature, letters, and scientific observations.

Hammurabi and Law as Performance

The Old Babylonian king Hammurabi (r. c. 1792–1750 BCE) famously had a large stone stele erected and inscribed with almost three hundred laws, crowned with an image of the king receiving authority from the sun god Shamash. The law code is less a statute book than a public display of royal justice. Its often-quoted prescription of “an eye for an eye” (lex talionis) is not a call for endless revenge but an attempt to cap retaliation at proportionality and to tie the king’s legitimacy to the protection of the weak against the strong. Reading Hammurabi’s laws carefully shows a stratified society in which elite men, commoners, and the enslaved had different values placed on their bodies and their testimony, and in which gender shaped every interaction with the state.

Egypt Along the Nile

Egyptian civilization took shape at roughly the same time but along a very different river. The Nile’s predictable flood cycle underwrote an agrarian economy of remarkable stability, and Egypt’s relative geographic isolation produced long stretches of political continuity organized into the Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms. At the apex sat the pharaoh, understood not merely as a king but as a living intermediary between the gods and the land. The pyramid complexes of the Old Kingdom, the temples of Karnak and Luxor, and the religious revolution of Akhenaten each reveal a world in which political, religious, and aesthetic orders were knit tightly together.

The Bronze Age International System and Its Collapse

By about 1500 BCE the eastern Mediterranean had become what archaeologists sometimes call the first international system: Egypt, the Hittite empire in Anatolia, the Mitanni, Assyria, Babylonia, the Mycenaean Greeks, and the city-states of the Levant were linked by diplomacy, dynastic marriage, and long-distance trade in tin, copper, ivory, and grain. The diplomatic archives from Amarna in Egypt preserve letters in Akkadian—the lingua franca of the age—exchanged among the great kings. Around 1200 BCE this entire system suddenly unraveled. Cities burned from the Peloponnese to the coast of Syria, major kingdoms vanished, literacy contracted, and trade routes dried up. Historians now explain the collapse not by a single cause but by a cascade of drought, earthquakes, migration (including the mysterious Sea Peoples), internal unrest, and the brittleness of top-heavy palace economies.

Chapter 3: The Greek Experiment

Out of the dark centuries that followed the Bronze Age collapse, new forms of political and cultural life took shape on the Aegean coasts and islands, in small, self-governing communities called poleis (singular: polis).

The Polis and the Invention of Politics

A polis was not simply a town but a civic community—a body of citizens bound by shared worship, shared law, and shared military obligation. Its physical core included a defensible acropolis, an agora for assembly and commerce, and temples to patron deities. In the eighth century BCE, the Greeks borrowed the Phoenician alphabet and adapted it to their own language, and the so-called Homeric epics—Iliad and Odyssey—crystallized out of centuries of oral tradition. The polis generated the vocabulary of politics itself: the words politics, democracy, aristocracy, tyranny, and oligarchy are all Greek, because the Greeks were the first to experiment systematically with all of these forms and to argue about which was best.

Sparta, Athens, and the Persian Wars

Two poleis came to dominate the historical imagination of the classical age. Sparta, on the Peloponnese, organized its entire society around a permanent warrior citizenry supported by an enslaved agricultural population, the helots, whose labor freed Spartan men for lifelong military training. Athens, in Attica, moved through a sequence of reforms—under Solon, Cleisthenes, and later Pericles—toward a radical direct democracy in which adult male citizens voted in assembly on matters of war, finance, and law. Women, resident foreigners (metics), and enslaved people were excluded, and the scale of Athenian democracy depended upon this exclusion. When the Persian king Darius and later Xerxes launched invasions of the Greek mainland in the early fifth century BCE, the Greek victories at Marathon, Salamis, and Plataea became a founding myth for later ideas about East-West contrast, though such neat binaries distort the deeply interconnected ancient Mediterranean.

Classical Athens: Thought, Tragedy, and Empire

The fifth century was Athens’ golden age and its tragedy. Pericles used the tribute of the Delian League to rebuild the Acropolis and fund the cultural explosion we call classical. The playwrights Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides staged tragedies about power, family, and the gods; Aristophanes mocked politicians in comedy; Thucydides wrote a history of the Peloponnesian War that still shapes political analysis; Socrates walked the agora asking questions until Athens executed him; his student Plato founded the Academy and composed dialogues on justice and knowledge; Plato’s student Aristotle built a systematic philosophy that dominated western thought for nearly two thousand years. Yet the same Athens that produced Antigone and the Republic ran an increasingly coercive empire and lost a long war to Sparta that left the polis world exhausted.

The tension between Thucydides and Plato on democracy is instructive. Thucydides admired Periclean Athens as a working example of self-rule under a charismatic statesman but chronicled how demagogy and fear drove the city to disaster in Sicily. Plato, horrified by Socrates' trial, argued that democracy was structurally unfit to produce wisdom and should be replaced by rule of philosophers. Both writers warn that self-government is fragile and that its defenders must think hard about what sustains it.

Alexander and the Hellenistic World

In the fourth century, the kingdom of Macedon under Philip II absorbed the Greek poleis; his son Alexander III (“the Great”) spent thirteen years (336–323 BCE) conquering Persia and campaigning as far as the Punjab. Alexander died at thirty-two in Babylon, and his generals carved his empire into successor kingdoms: the Ptolemies in Egypt, the Seleucids across the former Persian lands, and the Antigonids in Macedon. Greek became a lingua franca from the Nile to the Hindu Kush. The Hellenistic age that followed was cosmopolitan rather than classical: its cities were larger, its sciences more experimental (Archimedes, Euclid, Eratosthenes), its philosophies more personal (Stoicism, Epicureanism, Skepticism), and its religions more eclectic. Hellenism also provoked resistance. The Maccabean revolt of the 160s BCE, in which Judean traditionalists rejected Seleucid attempts to impose Greek worship in the Temple, became a template for later stories about faith against empire.

Chapter 4: Rome from Village to World Empire

Rome began as a cluster of hill villages on the Tiber and ended, roughly twelve centuries later, as a Mediterranean-wide state whose laws, roads, and language would outlast the empire itself.

The Roman Republic

The traditional date for the founding of the Roman Republic is 509 BCE, when the Romans expelled their last king and set up a constitutional order balancing two annually elected consuls, a powerful aristocratic Senate, and popular assemblies. Between roughly 500 and 270 BCE the Republic absorbed the rest of Italy through a mixture of war, colonization, and treaty, extending citizenship in tiered forms to former enemies. From 264 to 146 BCE three Punic Wars against Carthage ended with the complete destruction of that North African rival, gave Rome Sicily, Spain, and North Africa, and transformed Italian society as plunder and enslaved captives flowed into the peninsula. Small farmers were pushed off their land, displaced by slave-run estates (latifundia), and urban Rome swelled with the dispossessed.

The resulting strains fractured the Republic. Reforming tribunes like the Gracchi brothers (133 and 121 BCE) were murdered. Rival generals—Marius, Sulla, Pompey, Crassus, and finally Julius Caesar—turned their legions into personal retinues. After Caesar crossed the Rubicon in 49 BCE, won the civil war, and was stabbed by senators in 44 BCE, his grandnephew Octavian defeated Mark Antony and Cleopatra at Actium in 31 BCE and in 27 BCE assumed the title Augustus. Augustus preserved republican forms—he was “first citizen” (princeps), not king—while in practice founding the Roman Empire.

The High Empire

For roughly two centuries after Augustus, the Mediterranean world experienced what Edward Gibbon once called the happiest age of mankind and what more recent historians, with appropriate caveats about the enslaved and the conquered, call the Pax Romana. A network of roads and shipping lanes moved grain, olive oil, wine, textiles, and ideas from Britain to Syria. Latin dominated the western provinces, Greek the east. Roman law evolved from customary rules into a sophisticated system that would be quarried, centuries later, by medieval canonists and modern civil codes alike.

Religion in the Empire was plural and mostly tolerant. Civic cults, mystery religions (Mithras, Isis, Cybele), imperial cult, and philosophical schools coexisted. Into this pluralism came a small Jewish apocalyptic sect following Jesus of Nazareth, executed under the prefect Pontius Pilate around 30 CE. Its early missionaries, particularly Paul of Tarsus, carried the new movement out of Judea into the eastern Greek-speaking cities, and eventually to Rome itself.

The Long Transformation of the Third and Fourth Centuries

The third century CE brought crisis: plague, inflation, civilian-army revolts, the rise of the Sasanian Persian empire on the eastern frontier, and a kaleidoscopic turnover of emperors. Diocletian (r. 284–305) reimposed order through a sweeping reorganization that split the Empire into eastern and western halves, expanded the bureaucracy, and fixed prices and occupations. His successor Constantine (r. 306–337) took two enormous steps: in 313 he legalized Christianity with the Edict of Milan, and in 330 he founded a new imperial capital at Constantinople on the Bosporus. By the end of the fourth century, under Theodosius, Christianity became the official religion of the empire. In this same period, cross-frontier movements of Goths, Vandals, Alans, and others—often misleadingly called “barbarian invasions” and better described by Peter Heather as the mass migration of populations pressed westward by Hunnic raiding—reshaped the western provinces. In 410 the Visigoths sacked Rome; in 476 the Germanic general Odoacer deposed the last western emperor Romulus Augustulus, a date traditionally marking the fall of the Western Empire, though Rome had been transforming for generations before.

Chapter 5: After Rome — Byzantium, Islam, and the Early Medieval West

The Mediterranean of 500 CE looked like a Roman lake with some new landlords; by 750 it looked like three civilizational zones facing one another across contested waters. Peter Brown’s World of Late Antiquity and Chris Wickham’s Inheritance of Rome together reframe this period as a long, creative transformation rather than a simple fall.

Byzantium and the Eastern Roman Continuation

In the east, the Roman state simply continued, now Greek-speaking and emphatically Christian. Modern scholars call it Byzantium, but its own inhabitants called themselves Romans until the empire’s end in 1453. Under Justinian (r. 527–565), Byzantine armies briefly reconquered Italy, North Africa, and southern Spain; Justinian’s lawyers compiled Roman jurisprudence into the Corpus Iuris Civilis, a monument that centuries later would refound the study of law in western Europe. Justinian also built Hagia Sophia, whose vast dome became the model for sacred architecture across the Orthodox world. His reign was bracketed by the catastrophic Plague of Justinian (541 onward), one of the first well-documented pandemics, which devastated the eastern Mediterranean for two centuries.

The Rise of Islam

In the early seventh century, on the Arabian peninsula, the preaching of Muhammad (c. 570–632) rallied the tribes of Mecca and Medina into a new religious and political community. Within a century of his death, Arab Muslim armies had conquered the Sasanian Persian empire entirely, taken Egypt and Syria from Byzantium, crossed North Africa, and overrun the Visigothic kingdom of Spain. The resulting Umayyad Caliphate (661–750) and then the Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258) governed a world stretching from the Atlantic to Central Asia. Under the Abbasids, centered on Baghdad, a flowering of science, medicine, philosophy, and literature drew on Greek, Persian, Indian, and Arab traditions. The translation movement preserved and extended much of the Greek scientific corpus that medieval Europe would eventually rediscover in Latin through Arabic intermediaries.

Relations among the three Abrahamic communities under Islamic rule were shaped by documents like the Pact of Umar, a compact regulating the status of Christians and Jews as dhimmi (protected peoples). Such arrangements were unequal and varied widely in practice, but they usually allowed religious communities to maintain their own law and worship so long as they paid the jizya tax and accepted certain public markers of subordination.

The Early Medieval West and the Carolingians

West of the Rhine and the Alps, successor kingdoms—Visigothic Spain, Ostrogothic and then Lombard Italy, Merovingian Francia, Anglo-Saxon Britain—absorbed Roman law, Latin Christianity, and a dwindling cash economy. Literacy contracted to monasteries. The Irish monastic tradition and the mission of figures like Columbanus and Boniface reseeded Christianity across the north. In 751 a Frankish mayor of the palace named Pippin the Short deposed the last Merovingian; his son Charlemagne (r. 768–814) conquered Saxony, Lombardy, and parts of Spain, and was crowned “Emperor of the Romans” by Pope Leo III in Rome on Christmas Day, 800. The Carolingian Renaissance that accompanied his reign standardized Latin grammar and scripts (the beautiful Carolingian minuscule from which lowercase letters descend), copied classical texts, and reformed church discipline. Charlemagne’s empire did not long outlast him; by 843 the Treaty of Verdun split it into three, and the ninth and tenth centuries brought Viking, Magyar, and Arab raiding that stressed the fragile post-Roman order to its limits.

Chapter 6: The High Middle Ages

By around 1000 CE, Latin Europe emerged from the worst of the raids and entered a long period of demographic, economic, and cultural growth. Scholars often call the resulting world Latin Christendom to signal that its unity was ecclesiastical and cultural rather than political.

Lords, Peasants, and the Shape of the Countryside

Most Europeans in this period were peasants working the land under local lords within overlapping webs of obligation that historians gather under the inexact label feudalism. Land was held in exchange for service; lords held fiefs from greater lords in exchange for military aid and counsel; peasants owed labor, rents, and dues to the holders of the manors on which they lived. A large fraction of the rural population was serf—legally bound to the land but not chattel slaves. The manor, with its open fields divided into strips, its communal pasture, and its mill and oven held by the lord, was the basic economic unit. Beginning in the eleventh century, heavier plows, three-field rotation, water mills, and the harnessing of horses to agricultural labor together produced substantial gains in productivity, and population grew, probably doubling between roughly 1000 and 1300.

Towns, Universities, and the Commercial Revival

The same period saw a revival of long-distance trade and the reemergence of cities as economic and political actors. Venice, Genoa, and Pisa linked the Mediterranean to the eastern luxuries of the Levant; a network of fairs in Champagne connected Mediterranean and northern trade; the Hanseatic League knit together the Baltic and North Sea worlds. Italian cities experimented with republican self-government and developed techniques of double-entry bookkeeping, commercial partnership, and bills of exchange that historians sometimes call a Commercial Revolution. Out of the cathedral schools grew the universities: Bologna (law), Paris (theology and arts), Oxford, Salamanca, Padua. Teachers like Peter Abelard applied dialectical reasoning to theology; Thomas Aquinas wove Aristotle, newly reavailable through Arabic translation, into a vast Christian synthesis called Scholasticism.

Reform, Papacy, and the Crusades

From within the Church, reformers—first monastic, then papal—insisted on the independence of clergy from lay control. The Investiture Controversy between Pope Gregory VII and Emperor Henry IV (1076–1122) forced the question of whether kings or popes held ultimate authority over bishops and, by extension, the Christian social order. Gregorian reform reshaped medieval politics. In 1095 Pope Urban II, at the Council of Clermont, called on western knights to march east to the aid of Byzantium and liberate Jerusalem. The resulting First Crusade (1096–1099) stormed Jerusalem in an infamous massacre and established Crusader states along the Levantine coast. Over the next two centuries, further crusades were launched—some against Muslim powers in the east, some against Christian heretics in Languedoc, some against pagans on the Baltic, some diverted in 1204 to sack Constantinople itself. The Crusades are best read, following historians like Christopher Tyerman, not as an aberration but as a long phase of Latin Europe’s violent, expansive reorientation toward the wider world. Urban’s call itself survives in four different chronicled versions, each shaped by the agenda of its recorder—a reminder that primary sources are always positioned.

The so-called Twelfth-Century Renaissance was a cluster of intellectual transformations: the revival of Roman law at Bologna, the translation of Greek and Arabic scientific works at Toledo, the rise of Gothic architecture beginning at Saint-Denis under Abbot Suger, and the growth of vernacular literature in the chanson de geste and the romances of Chretien de Troyes. The point of the label is that the fifteenth-century Italian Renaissance was not the first time Europeans rediscovered antiquity or pushed the boundaries of learning; it was the most famous of several such moments.

Chapter 7: The Late Middle Ages and a World Reordered

The fourteenth century was brutal. A cooling climate (the Little Ice Age), famine from 1315 to 1322, and the political strains of the Hundred Years’ War (1337–1453) between England and France battered the high medieval synthesis. Then came the plague.

The Black Death and Its Aftermath

Arriving from inner Asia by way of Genoese trading galleys at Caffa and Messina in 1347, Yersinia pestis swept across Europe in two years and killed, on most estimates, between one-third and one-half of the population. Entire villages disappeared. Social and economic structures were shaken so hard that they could not be put back together the same way. Labor became scarce, and surviving peasants pressed for better terms. Landlords responded with wage freezes and statutes, which in turn helped spark peasant revolts—in France (the Jacquerie, 1358), in England (1381), in Florence (the Ciompi, 1378). In much of western Europe, serfdom gradually faded as peasants gained bargaining power; in much of eastern Europe, paradoxically, serfdom tightened over the same centuries.

Church, State, and the Cracks in Medieval Unity

The spiritual authority of the papacy was already strained. From 1309 to 1377 the popes lived at Avignon under heavy French influence; from 1378 to 1417 two and then three rival popes excommunicated one another in the Great Western Schism. Reformers like John Wyclif in England and Jan Hus in Bohemia called for a return to Scripture and attacked clerical corruption and the sale of indulgences. Hus was burned at Constance in 1415 despite a promise of safe conduct; his followers fought Catholic armies to a standstill in the Hussite Wars and kept the idea of a reforming, vernacular, national church alive on the continent for another century.

At the same time, monarchies in France, England, Portugal, Castile, and Aragon strengthened their administrations, imposed regular taxation, and began to behave more like unified states than personal estates. The Silk Road connection that had linked Europe to Mongol and Chinese worlds in the thirteenth century—famously traveled by Marco Polo and reflected in the 1245–1246 letter exchange between Pope Innocent IV and the Great Khan Guyuk—contracted under plague and the collapse of Mongol unity, but the memory of eastern wealth reoriented European interest toward finding new routes to Asia.

Chapter 8: Renaissance, Print, and Voyages

The cultural movement we call the Renaissance grew out of the Italian city-states, especially Florence, in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Its core intellectual program was humanism, the systematic study of classical Greek and Latin texts as guides to eloquence, ethics, and civic life. Humanists like Petrarch, Leonardo Bruni, and Lorenzo Valla treated antiquity not as a quarry for authorities but as a lost world to be reconstructed through philology, and their critical techniques eventually turned against forged medieval documents (Valla’s famous exposure of the Donation of Constantine) and, later, against the text of the Vulgate Bible itself.

Art, Patronage, and the Northern Renaissance

Under the patronage of merchant princes like the Medici, Italian artists—Masaccio, Donatello, Botticelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Raphael—pursued new techniques of perspective, anatomy, and oil painting to represent human bodies and built spaces with unprecedented depth. The Renaissance moved north in modified forms: Erasmus of Rotterdam wrote satirical Latin prose, produced a critical edition of the Greek New Testament (1516), and called for a piety grounded in scripture and inward devotion; Albrecht Durer brought Italian techniques to German printmaking; Thomas More wrote Utopia. Northern humanism’s combination of textual criticism and moral reform would soon feed directly into the Reformation.

The Print Revolution

Around 1450, in Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg introduced movable metal type to Europe. Within fifty years, printing presses operated in more than two hundred cities, and several million books had been produced. The print revolution standardized texts, accelerated the spread of ideas, cheapened access to learning, and made possible both the Protestant Reformation and the scientific communities of the seventeenth century. As Elizabeth Eisenstein argued, the printing press changed not just what people read but how they argued, remembered, and disagreed.

Voyages and First Encounters

The same decades saw Portuguese and then Castilian sailors push out into the Atlantic. Portuguese expeditions down the African coast, motivated by gold, slaves, and a desire to outflank Muslim middlemen, reached the Cape of Good Hope in 1488 and India in 1498. In 1492, Christopher Columbus, sailing under the Castilian crown, crossed the Atlantic and made landfall in the Caribbean. The devastating consequences of this encounter for the peoples of the Americas are central to any honest account of what “early modern” means. Old World diseases, against which Indigenous populations had no acquired immunity, killed perhaps ninety percent of the pre-contact population of the Americas within a century. Spanish conquistadores like Cortes and Pizarro exploited this demographic catastrophe, along with local alliances and superior steel and horses, to topple the Aztec and Inca empires. The transatlantic slave trade, initially Portuguese, began carrying enslaved Africans to Atlantic sugar plantations in the sixteenth century on a scale that would eventually reach some twelve million people. A “new world” was built at the cost of older ones.

At the same time, Caroline Dodds Pennock and other historians have shown that Indigenous people were not simply acted upon; Aztec, Inuit, Wendat, and other visitors crossed the Atlantic in the other direction, and figures like al-Hasan al-Wazzan (the subject of Natalie Zemon Davis’s Trickster Travels), a sixteenth-century Muslim diplomat who was captured, converted to Christianity in Rome, and wrote an influential Italian description of Africa, embody a Mediterranean whose boundaries between Christendom and the Islamic world were far more porous than later national histories would admit. A 1641 account of a Gaspesian (Mi’kmaq) elder replying to French missionaries, defending his people’s way of life against European claims of superiority, is one of many surviving texts that register the Indigenous side of the encounter.

Chapter 9: Reformations and the Age of Religious War

The early sixteenth-century explosion we call the Reformation was not a single event but a cascade of overlapping reform movements, each shaped by local politics, print culture, humanist scholarship, and long-running anxieties about sin, salvation, and the authority of the medieval Church. Diarmaid MacCulloch’s The Reformation: A History captures both the theological seriousness and the messy contingency of the whole process.

Luther and the Breakaway from Rome

On 31 October 1517, Martin Luther, an Augustinian friar and professor of theology at Wittenberg, posted or at least circulated ninety-five theses protesting the sale of indulgences—written grants of remission from the temporal penalties of sin—being marketed in Germany to fund rebuilding Saint Peter’s in Rome. Luther’s core theological claim was that salvation comes through faith alone (sola fide), by grace alone, on the authority of scripture alone (sola scriptura), and that the medieval penitential system misread Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Under attack from Rome, protected by the elector of Saxony, and amplified by a printing industry hungry for German-language pamphlets, Luther was formally excommunicated in 1521 and placed under imperial ban by the young Charles V at the Diet of Worms. His translation of the Bible into German, his catechisms, and his hymns built a vernacular piety that became the foundation of German Protestantism.

Luther’s movement quickly outran him. Peasants rose against their lords in 1524–1525 citing Christian liberty—the Twelve Articles of Memmingen of 1525 expressed their mixture of religious and social grievances—and Luther, to the horror of many later admirers, endorsed their brutal suppression. A more radical reform tradition, later called Anabaptism, rejected infant baptism, oaths, state churches, and sometimes private property; Anabaptists were persecuted by Catholics and Protestants alike. In the Swiss cities, Ulrich Zwingli at Zurich pushed reform further than Luther on the Eucharist and other points, while in the 1530s and 1540s John Calvin made Geneva a disciplined model of a reformed community and articulated the doctrine of predestination and the presbyterian organization of the church.

Catholic Reform and the Wars of Religion

The Catholic Church, often called Counter-Reformation but better described as Catholic Reformation, responded with its own deep renewal. The Council of Trent (1545–1563) clarified doctrine, reformed clerical training, standardized the liturgy, and reaffirmed the Latin Vulgate and the sacramental system. New religious orders, especially Ignatius of Loyola’s Jesuits, carried Catholic reform into schools, missions, and the royal courts of Europe and the world. Missionaries reached Japan, China, India, and the Americas; figures like the Bohemian Jesuit Paul Klein on the Palaos Islands exemplify the way Catholic expansion interlaced with European imperial voyages.

The religious divisions unleashed a century of intermittent warfare. The French Wars of Religion (1562–1598) included the notorious Saint Bartholomew’s Day massacre of Protestants (Huguenots) in 1572 and ended when Henry of Navarre became king, converted to Catholicism, and issued the Edict of Nantes (1598) granting limited toleration. The Dutch Revolt against Spanish rule (1568–1648) eventually produced an independent, Calvinist, commercially dynamic Dutch Republic whose Amsterdam became the financial capital of Europe. The Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648) began as a religious conflict in Bohemia and spread across central Europe, devastating German lands and killing perhaps one third of their population, before ending in the Peace of Westphalia, a settlement that codified state sovereignty, religious pluralism among Lutheran, Calvinist, and Catholic powers, and the exhaustion of confessional warfare. Around the same time, from roughly 1560 to 1660, Europe experienced its most intense wave of witch hunts, in which perhaps fifty to sixty thousand people—disproportionately women—were executed on charges of diabolical pact and maleficent magic; recent scholarship, especially Merry Wiesner-Hanks’s work on gender, places these trials in the context of religious anxiety, legal change, and the social vulnerability of aging poor women.

State Building on the Cusp of Modernity

By 1650 the political landscape of Europe looked recognizably modern in outline. The emerging territorial states—Spain, France, England, the Dutch Republic, Sweden, and a transforming Holy Roman Empire—built standing armies, regular taxation, professional bureaucracies, and codes of courtly conduct and religious conformity. Historians like Michael Braddick speak of this period as one of social and political discipline, in which states, churches, landlords, and communities together enforced new standards on bodies, beliefs, and labor. The Dutch Republic, its wealth drawn from Baltic grain, North Sea herring, Asian spices, and global finance, exemplified a different path—a federated, commercial, relatively tolerant republic whose painters, philosophers, and printers set a template for an Atlantic modernity whose full emergence lies beyond the chronological boundary of this course.

Chapter 10: Looking Back Across the Arc

A course that runs from the first cities of Sumer to the Peace of Westphalia covers more than four thousand years, and the only honest way to hold it all together is by asking recurring questions rather than by memorizing a single story. How did small groups of humans scale up into states, and who paid the price for urban civilization? How did religions and philosophies justify those states and sometimes oppose them? How did the Mediterranean serve both as a highway and as a frontier among Latin Christendom, the Greek Orthodox world, and the Islamic caliphates, and how did those three civilizations reshape one another for a thousand years? Why did Latin Europe, for centuries a backwater on the edge of more sophisticated powers, come by the seventeenth century to project its ships, priests, soldiers, and diseases across oceans? And how should we tell this story with the people who were conquered, enslaved, silenced, or exiled rather than only with the kings and theologians whose voices dominate the archive?

The habits of historical thinking that this course asks students to practice are more important than any single fact. Change over time, context, causality, contingency, and complexity—the “five Cs” sometimes taught as the craft of the discipline—are not slogans but working tools. Change over time resists the assumption that things were always as they are. Context keeps texts and events in the worlds that produced them. Causality forces us to weigh competing explanations. Contingency reminds us that outcomes were not inevitable. Complexity refuses the easy binaries of West and East, Christian and pagan, medieval and modern. Applied across the chapters above, these habits convert “Western civilization” from a trophy into a problem—and make the problem worth thinking about.

Back to top